🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 897+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Lincoln Logs, Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(897 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$30
$50
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln LogsUsed

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Lincoln Logs, Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs

Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs
Used

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2216

Category: Toys > Building Toys > Wooden Blocks

Original Price:$50 USD

Sale Price:$30 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8159 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific find!
For the price, it works fine which feels reasonable.
22 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extremely pleased
The Lincoln Logs, Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs is practical and elementary.
12 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase​
1 month ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb quality
Personally, it works well enough and it meets expectations.
34 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
extremely satisfied
In daily use, the Lincoln Logs, Vintage 1989 Playskool Lincoln Logs works fine and it’s fine overall.
39 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply incredible
To be fair, it feels solid enough which feels reasonable. distribution was normal.
32 people found this helpful