🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 815+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

EVA SLINGBACK - vintage heels

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(815 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$338
$563.33
Sale
βœ“ at no charge delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Shoe tip : PointedHeel type : StilettoFastening : StrapsPattern : PlainDetails : Elastic insertArticle number : ST511B06N-Q11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt dispatch
↩️
handy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

EVA SLINGBACK - vintage heels

Shoe tip : Pointed
Heel type : Stiletto
Fastening : Straps
Pattern : Plain
Details : Elastic insert
Article number : ST511B06N-Q11

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 267250

Category: Women > Shoes > Pumps

Original Price:$563.33 USD

Sale Price:$338 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 815 reviews
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly suggest EVA SLINGBACK - vintage heels
the EVA SLINGBACK - retro heels performs as expected which is good enough.
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless for EVA SLINGBACK - timeless heels
After several use, the EVA SLINGBACK - retro heels does its job so no complaints.
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified
1 month ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous Quality
Honestly, it does the job so it’s acceptable.
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable EVA SLINGBACK - timeless heels!
To be fair, the EVA SLINGBACK - timeless heels is effortless to use which is good enough. No setup issues.
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified
2 months ago
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore this EVA SLINGBACK - enduring heels!
After a few days, the EVA SLINGBACK - iconic heels is convenient to use which is good enough. Works fine so far.