🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 499+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Matchbox 1:64 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(499 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$4.99
$8.32
Sale
βœ“ complimentary shipment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Matchbox 1:64 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift Shipping
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Matchbox 1:64 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL

Matchbox 1:64 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 710863

Category: Toys > Vintage & Antique Toys > Cars

Original Price:$8.32 USD

Sale Price:$4.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1390 reviews
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely flawless
I wouldn’t say it’s fabulous, but the Matchbox 1:64 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL is decent.
23 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
At first, the Matchbox 1:64 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL is elementary to use and it meets expectations.
30 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
superb choice
extremely happy customer. appreciate the Matchbox 1:64 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL.
6 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply incredible
The Matchbox 1:64 1963 Mercedes-Benz 230 SL looks normal in real use.
45 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Couldn't be happier
Honestly, it does the job which is good enough.
44 people found this helpful