๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 233+ reviews
Outdoorโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.2 out of 5(233 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$26
$43.33
Sale
โœ“ complimentary shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

This price is for both of them

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside

This price is for both of them

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1015327

Category: Outdoor > Watering Equipment > Rain Barrels

Original Price:$43.33 USD

Sale Price:$26 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 7390 reviews
MK
Megan King
4 months ago ยท recent York, NY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Really superb
I didnโ€™t notice any defects on the Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside.
8 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Orlando, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
So happy with this
The Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside feels reasonably well made.
10 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Highly satisfied
The Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside feels sturdy and reliable.
22 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Columbus, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Worth every penny
In daily use, it feels okay and it works for me.
35 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Milwaukee, WI

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
No complaints
After a few days, the Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside performs as expected which is good enough. Works fine so far.
16 people found this helpful