๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.4/5 from 676+ reviews
Kidsโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

K-MINI - Sandals

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.4 out of 5(676 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$23
$38.33
Sale
โœ“ complimentary shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Shoe tip : RoundHeel type : FlatFastening : Hook-and-loop fastenerPattern : PrintArticle number : KA113G00H-C12

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift dispatch
โ†ฉ๏ธ
practical Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

K-MINI - Sandals

Shoe tip : Round
Heel type : Flat
Fastening : Hook-and-loop fastener
Pattern : Print
Article number : KA113G00H-C12

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1536498

Category: Kids > Shoes > Sandals

Original Price:$38.33 USD

Sale Price:$23 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ on the house delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.4
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 1395 reviews

AR
Aaron Roberts โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Albuquerque, NM
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
ultimate purchase ever
superb packaging and quality K-MINI - Sandals.
29 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Columbus, OH

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
No complaints
At first, the K-MINI - Sandals performs as expected and it meets expectations.
49 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Louisville, KY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Absolutely faultless
The quality of this K-MINI - Sandals is impressive.
38 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Austin, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A+ quality
After a few days, it performs as expected which is good enough. shipping was normal.
34 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner
5 months ago ยท Jacksonville, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
supreme decision
The K-MINI - Sandals quality is about what I expected.
40 people found this helpful