๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.4/5 from 805+ reviews
Womenโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.4 out of 5(805 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$79.95
$133.25
Sale
โœ“ complimentary shipment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
swift Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose



This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 2156559

Category: Women > ACCESSORIES > Sunglasses

Original Price:$133.25 USD

Sale Price:$79.95 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ complimentary shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.4
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 7814 reviews
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago ยท Indianapolis, IN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Highly satisfied
Personally, the Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose does its job so Iโ€™m okay with it.
39 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor โœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago ยท Virginia Beach, VA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Super happy
After a few days, the Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose is elementary to use and it meets expectations.
23 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase​
7 months ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
marvelous product
At first, the Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose is practical so Iโ€™m okay with it.
6 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Phoenix, AZ
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
remarkable investment
To be fair, it feels okay so no complaints.
23 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Five stars!
The Longchamp Sunglasses LO 707 S 208 Havana Rose does what it should.
8 people found this helpful